Tuesday, November 13, 2007
Charlottesville, Va
As humans we have a strange relationship with death. The only species known to bury their dead, we approach the matter the only way we know how, and that is the same way we approach life. We each mourn our own way, perform the appropriate ceremonies, and then we adorn the newly departed with their own structures and architectures of stone, granite, plaster and metal. We shelter them from the elements by placing them in a tomb, then marking their location and memory with headstones, crypts, monuments or placards. Architecture may be the only thing we can take with us. In Paris, these burial plots combine to form districts of the cemetery, which are divided by boulevards, streets, or pathways. These in turn are given identification, and street signs are erected. At certain intersections, a large obelisk or sepulcher may be placed in the center, declaring itself a landmark from which visitors can get their bearings and migrate in the right direction. By applying theories of architecture and urbanism as understood by the living to places inhabited by the dead, cemeteries become places where two worlds meet and occupy the same space, both in the physical sense and symbolically. Although used for many activities in a densely packed city of bustling vibrancy these cemeteries, with their urban organization and architectural exonerations are still places of memory, of respect and somber reflection on our own mortality.
Sunday, November 11, 2007
Charlottesville, Va
So the project will be broken into a few parts:
The first will be a preliminary review which I will give in 2 weeks. This review is our final presentation for Design Research, but really just an opportunity to have some feedback from others to see how we are approaching the ideas and where we can head from there.
The second part will come early next semester, when I present one or a few of my essays from the summer, for the Nix Fellowship presentations.
The third and final part will be my thesis presentation, right now shaping up to be an intermodal transit station located outside Washington, D.C, with urban parallels between D.C. and Paris (to justify not doing a project there, really).
Stay tuned for more. As I continue to get more information / visuals in the next two weeks I will try to post them. The net 4 weeks will be rather busy, so it may not be until then that I update again. Hopefully a few short posts will suffice.
Monday, October 15, 2007
Thursday, October 4, 2007
Charlottesville, Va.
I'm coming to the realization that in order to make a strong case for Personality of Place and its design implications I won't be able to use my original essays as planned. In a way it's okay, since they have been very helpful in forming this idea, but also sad because I won't be able to use them as I had intended. Still, I have plenty of contributions for the Lunch publication in the spring.
Friday, September 28, 2007
A Tale of Two-Cities
There are these beautiful places: beautiful because they are exotic and exotic because they are mysterious. They are famous places and rustic secrets; Paris, Vienna, Rome, Siena, and each brings its own charms to the table, creating a persona either real or imagined, that is portrayed to the world via film, literature, art, music, and spoken tales.
It's possible to visit these places we hear and read about, although our experiences will differ from those of Shakespeare, Moliere, Thoreau, or Charlie Chaplin. But where their stories end our own can begin. When we travel to visit these places we develop our own narratives, create our own characters and plots and are anxious for the day we return to normalcy and relive our own narrations, while adding to the fantasies of others who have not been, and rekindling the fond fires of those who have.
Unfortunately for my kind, these fantasies are but one side of the story. It's in the fiber of my body, like lungs or eyelids, that when I find one of these magical places I want to know why it works, how it's made, why it feels so special, and how I can bring this experience to everyone. This brings a course of analysis and critique. I do what I can to find the source of this enchantment and unfortunately for myself in the very process of understanding its beauty I destroy that which I sought to understand.
Wednesday, September 12, 2007
Charlottesville, Va.
41 Days in
Thesis abstract:
Contextual attributes exemplified by syntactic, social, political, infrastructural and technological considerations are examined in their physical manifestations in relation to contemporary Parisian architecture. Explored examples reflect the reality of the constructed pre-conditions of any site in the dense urbanism of
Research Description:
Goals and Aims
The goal of this research is to identify attributes and qualities which, along with historic and built context, contribute to the context of a specific place. Of these attributes, several will be chosen as case studies and explored in greater depth.
*************************************************This is where we are right now. I'm falling dangerously behind on my writing because of a design competition I'm working on which finishes later this week. I'm hoping that next week I'll be able to get a solid start on these essays. On that note, I'm having to rewrite or refocus just about all of them because of the subtly shifting sands of my theses. Considering they're each running between 3,000 and 4,000 words this is quite the undertaking, but as I go I may be paring a few of them down to the 1,000 word range, to make them shorter and more concise, and so that it's not page after page of my rambling. Also, it allows me to give priority to the ones that uphold what is now the main thrust of my paper, and letting some of the peripheral essays (those that don't really have anything to do with context or architecture, but are still interesting) fall back a bit. I should have one or two near completion by next week, so be on the lookout.
Sunday, August 19, 2007
Charlottesville, Va.
Original Thesis:
Develop a series of patterns that define the architectural interpretation of contemporary built works of the historic urban fabric in
41 Days in
6 Memos for any Millenium: The language of architecture can be distilled into a series of elements (structure, light, circulation, proportion, and surface) which, regardless of their aesthetic form, play an important role in the formation of coherent architecture in all styles and time periods.
Souterrain: The role of transportation infrastructures, specifically as they apply underground, continually inform and deform our understanding of the city as a continuous logical landscape, as well as a series of event spaces and flows.
Cities and the Dead: Past creative uses of the intricate latticework of voids underneath
In-Tent-City: Subcultural movements exist within the Parisian homeless community, defined by community cooperation, creative solutions to survival techniques, and nomadic tendencies. These groups challenge contemporary practices of urban living while simultaneously raising awareness for their own plight.
Monu-Mentality: The Grands Projets serve as monuments spread across
Old Ideas, New Constructions: Haussmann was able to apply earlier urban concepts in new ways to transform
The Francophone Candidates: Many of the contemporary projects around
Interview with Christophe Lab: Designing contemporary works in forgotten places, and the role of context in
The thesis for "41 days in Paradise" will be the overarching thesis which ties each of these disparate essays into a coherent string of thought. Given that enormous task, I am not sure just what that thesis is. I do think that it is not so far from my original plan, in that it draws significantly from the contextual, cultural, and infrastructural zeitgeists surrounding contemporary Paris, instead referencing these as the starting points for architectural conception. The other problem is, and this one I never really defined, is whether "architectural conception" is aesthetic, functional, social, etc., in nature. This is something I will need to address in "41 days".
Sunday, August 12, 2007
Charlottesville, Va.
The second thing I would like to do is to make up a revisable schedule. I say revisable because my on the ground schedule was obsolete within 9 days, and I don't think this will be much different. Still, with studio, exams, papers, research, and the occasional free moment, and with a tentative final presentation circa mid-october, I will need something to keep me on track. Piggy-backing this research with my design research class ought to help, but to what extent, I'm not sure.
So stay tuned. I'll begin posting writings as they near completion and/or reflection points. Comments/critiques are most vividly welcomed in all cases.
Monday, July 9, 2007
Paris, France
The trip has evolved just as much as my project. I came here and was surprised by what I was finding. I chose to embrace that, and I think some of my early thoughs about what I would accomplish were in a sense jaded. As I got back into the groove of the city things started making more sense. I was able to think clearer, and understand the city better. I never did come up with a step by step plan on how to read Paris, but that may not even be possible. There is no one certain way to interact with the city. Once can come to see the sites. One can come and work alongside the sites and never visit them, or at least not often. Others may live in the suburbs and commute to the outer arrondissements, never casting a glance at beaux-arts architecture. Others may only choose to live in Paris as a fantasy, through books or movies or television, in lieu of visiting themselves. So I, as a student, as a traveller, cannot say that I have found the way to view Paris. What I have found is A way. One. And it has shaped my understanding.
I'm not going to place a project in Paris. It will be too hard, too difficult to even begin the process. I never found a suitable site, I cannot find measurable maps or documents, and if I forget a photo, I'm screwed. What looks to be a better possibility is a project based in a reachable US city, Washington DC perhaps, and giving the project some French link, so that I can focus on my interpretations of Paris and tie them into the project. This will accompany the document I will make this fall.
The weather just sucked. Today was a fitting memorial for my time here, as it would rain for a few minutes, then be sunny, then another storm would roll in, and so on, throughout the day. It seemed the entire time I was here I was ducking raindrops or getting rained out of a drawing. Last time I was here it was sunny and hot, the entire trip, save for maybe 2 rainy days. This time, it downpoured three weeks ago and hasn't let up since. The dry days are cloudy, and the wet ones are cold and windy. I blame global warming.
In the end, if I had to call it a good or bad trip (because we must always summarize the events of our lives, especially those drawn out over several weeks, with a host of complex emotions interspersed) I would say it was a good trip. It was a good trip because I've packed a lot of experience, a lot of thoughts, of visions, of memories, of concepts, and abstractions into the last 40-odd days. It's helped me understand the built environment and has at least helped me contemplate architectures role within that environment. That, and it is Paris.
For being the supposed heavy time of keeping this journal of my travels, the next step is to keep it up on some sort of semi-regular basis. Of course I'll have a few weeks off, maybe won't work on it much during the first few weeks of school. It will pick up again sporadically, between the lecture and pieceing together some sort of book, to talking to Peter's students, to what will hopefully be a thesis project in the fall. But that's a long way away. For now I'm going to go enjoy the last of 41 days in PARadISe.
Tuesday, July 3, 2007
Paris, France
I guess the building plays a critical role in my research, at the crux of Parisien culture and technology, contemporary architecture, literature, historic architecture, Corbusian urbanism, and a national history condensed into a series of Grands Projets. Unfortunately I was not able to draw it, as the weather was bad and I struck out without my drawing supplies. But I have a few photos of it though. This photo, taken from the avant>>apres exhibit, casts two of the towers in a snowy fog that captures the isolation of the site. Despite this, the deck remains a farily populated place, and despite the best of my intentions to show it as an isolated uninhabited landscape, I couldn't manage to keep the people out of my photographs. I suppose my personal biases toward the project show through after all. Take that,
self-censorship.
Monday, July 2, 2007
Paris, France
After searching for a decent competition to base my project off of and failing, I've decided that I should not base my thesis in Paris. It would be hard enough to get site information and decent photos, and I wouldn't have acess to the site if I needed to go back for anything. Right now I'm rethinking the thesis end of this, and am now thinking that if it does follow up this bit of research I should do a "french" project along the east coast in the US. For example, a Franco-American art museum in Washington DC or New York. This gives me the added opportunity to raod test a few of the ideas I have developed here to see if they're valid outside of Paris or Europe, and revisioning Washington DC as a hybrid-Parisian-exquisite corpse may ellicit some interesting parallels to the physical urban environments of each, yielding what would essentially be a museum designed specifically for its context. And, since this whole crazy experiment began by searching for a relationship between contemporary architecture and its context, everyhting seems to meld together at the last moment. This is all rhetoric at this point and I still need to pitch it to possible critics, but for now I think that this route will yield an overall stronger project.
So for the next week I'll continue getting the last of my photos in line, and follow up on some final information concerning the METRO system, a few of the Grands Projets, and an interview, rescheduled for the day before I leave.
Saturday, June 30, 2007
Paris, France
My interview with Christope Lab this morning was rescheduled due to them being in the middle of a competition, and no one speaking a lick of English. Of course I, dropping the ball, cannot even ask my questions in French. So we're rescheduled for the 10th, interpreter and all. That meeting too may be cancelled, and the interview may have to be done via internet, which I'm not to happy about, but will work if needed. Other than that it's been a few slow days here. I'm going to map out some night routes to get some night shots of a few major works before I skip town in less than 2 weeks, which may compensate for an otherwise washed out series of graytone photographs. I've been using saturation filters way too often.
Thursday, June 28, 2007
Paris, France
With 2 weeks to go I'm working on getting some final pictures of a few projects around town...and about 10 drawings left, thanks to a bout of bead weather (and being locked out of the Musee du Quai Branly 3 days straight). Once the interview is completed I'll have a bit more time to devote to getting drawings finished. I had originally planned on having three more essays completed before leaving but now I think that decent starts will have to be enough...they've been difficult to crack into and as usual I'm not quite pleased with the level of thought.
Tuesday, June 26, 2007
Paris, France
Monday, June 25, 2007
Paris, France
Despite some wicked weather I am plugging along on drawings, having completed two yesterday and one today, and another 2 scheduled for tomorrow, weather permitting. In addition, I have at least some ideas for another three of the essays, getting us up to all but 1 or so that have some sort of concept or direction. My rain delay alternative for tomorrow is to begin writing about the fabulous souterrain, the underground of Paris. Mostly I'm focusing on the Metro system and its natural ability to be very disorienting, and how it represents itself (via maps, etc.) in a completely different way. But this could use some beefing up. As with most of the essays, they've become observational and really lack any new ideas or putting forth any arguments, which is not what I wanted from them. But I have all next semester to make sense of them. I'm basically here to collect information. I'm currently getting my hands on some CATIA models of the major subway stops, without the groud. They're surprisingly well ordered.
Sunday, June 24, 2007
Paris, France
2 weeks. Let's see how we do...
Thursday, June 21, 2007
Paris, France
For one, I have passed the halfway mark on a paradoxically fast and slow trip. The weekends drag by, but the weeks, well, it's already Thursday. In the meantime I have finished a second essay on the so called "tent phenomenon" of some 550 tents that have been donated to the homeless of Paris. The move has of course brought alot of attention to the subject of homelessness, but form my perspective it introduces interesting juxtapositions against Beaux-arts stone architecture.
There is also something interesting about "urban nomads", entire communities that can pick up and go at the command of a police officer. And, it goes without saying, the idea of urban nomadic communities has also piqued my interest. Entire subcultures, unabashedly setting up camp in the shadows of Notre Dame and the Centre Pompidou.
So as we've crossed the halfway point, we're getting to the point where things are beginning to fall together. I have 3 more essays and, God willing, an interview to conduct before I leave town in 2 short weeks. When I'm back I'll have another 2 or 3 essays to write form the comfort of my own home, as they need little more from me at this point than photo documantation to go along with the text.
Monday, June 18, 2007
Paris, France
Saturday, June 16, 2007
Paris, France
With one essay down and another quickly taking shape, I'm pretty happy with where I am. The last one and this one, based on the monumentality of the Grands Projets, are two of the larger, more intensive writings I have planned. But dealing with really alrge buildings day in and day out has kind of burnt me out, so for the first part of next week I will be switching gears to photo-documenting a few of the shorter, more photographic esays. This should give me a few days to clear my head and come back on the GP essay with a fresh head.
Just about the time I'm heading back onto the GP essay I'll be hitting the halfway point of the trip. Looking back it feels as if each day has been very long and substantial, but in all, the weeks feel like they're going pretty quickly. Thursdays seem to sneak up on me quickly and suddenly I think I'm falling behind, but the weekends go slow enough that I catch up.
Heading to the Bastille Opera for a tour yesterday, I ran into Gil and the group from UWM sitting on the staircase. They had just gotten into town a few hours prior, but maybe my mid-week I'll be able to meet up with a few of them and go do some socialising. I could use a stiff drink before thinking about the Grand Arche again.
Thursday, June 14, 2007
Paris, France
So with one essay more or less finished I'm ready ot move on to the next one - the Grands Projets. Essentially, there were seven buildings constructed in the 80's and 90's by then president Francois Mitterand. From my view, they're all really damn big. So I would like to look at scale in contemporary parisian architecture, but also historically, since the French have been building big for a long time. Also what the use of scale means, architecturally and symbolically, and if the treatment of these monstrous buildings is consistent with their messages. It's a chance to actually do a bit of criticism and diving into a bit of theory on them. So that will take me through sometime early next week, hopefully.
We've had a few days of rain on and off here, so it's been tougher to go out, or at least tougher to get myself to go out. Today I officially pass the 1/3 marker of this trip, and although there's plenty of time left, it still makes me kind of nervous. I still haven't really developed a system for analysing the city.
Monday, June 11, 2007
Paris, France
Friday, June 8, 2007
Paris, France
So with one week down and four to go, I did some major work yesterday to figure out just what I am doing here. I decided that the best route for me is not to do a single report or research on one topic. So far, my experiences have been way too varied and chaotic to boil all my thoughts into one coherent topic. I decided I would be much better off coming up with a series of essays which are put into a single compilation which documents my travels and experiences, and hopefully with a singular architectural thread. So far I have come up with three or four different topics that can be expanded into essays, and today I spent some time riding the Metro and documenting some of the things I had seen earlier this week but had not had a chance to document. My "schedule" says that by today I should be writing an outline for just how I am going to pursuit the analysis of the candidate buildings I was also to have picked by today. Instead I have the bones of about four essays, and plenty of other documentation to back up my experiences. If this continues for another four weeks, I will be sitting quite well. The key now is consistency.
I am also waiting for a reply from my advisors, Profs. Ford, Kinnard, and Dripps. This is a rather strange deviation from my original proposal (though I've kept it as one of the essay topics) but whether this will fly with them has yet to be decided. However, I feel better about it, since my mind has already been stretching in several directions, and what's more, I have something to show for it already. The greater challenges lie in creating a thread that binds all of these essays together, and most importantly, how this fits in with any type of final project for my thesis. At the end of this I may have some "research" but more likely I will have several criticisms, cultural barometers, manifestos and interpretive zeitgeists that are all well and good, but don't get me any closer to a thesis topic.
Maybe that will come. I'm only 20% through this trip, so there is still much more time to figure out the common links, and how to turn this into more than a pretty paper.
Monday, June 4, 2007
Paris, France
When it started to rain and I realized I had been up 6 hours and it wasn't even lunchtime, I headed back to base and worked out a schedule for myself.
Basically I want to have a bit of Historic analysis first so I have something to compare it to. Then I'll get into the contemporary works, which I've slated myself as having locked in by the end of the week. There are alot of unaccounted for factors, lots of gaps and holes that will need to be filled in, but at least this gives me some kind of goal to shoot for. Personally I'm kinda excited for "Reverse Engineer Paris"
While I was at the Place du Carousel this morning, I got to musing about the difference between Paris and Venice, which I also visited earlier this year. Aside from being wed to the sea (literally, in a ceremony held each year) Venice is a city very much about its meandering pathways, its tight and narrow spots, and its campi, which serve as the only way to orient yourself in the city without your nose in a map. In Paris it is not the Place, or rather the nodal intersections of pathways, but the pathways themselves. Paris is rife with long, broad streets and boulevards that stretch into the infinite beyond (these came prior to Haussmann, as I've learned, and could be traced to Vicennes). It is in the act of crossing one of the boulevards and catching a glimpse to a landmark out on the horizon that one places themselves in the context. This is a world apart from the Venetian experience, and I'm curious as to whether one is intrinsically simpler to understand than another.
Saturday, June 2, 2007
Paris, France
The apartment I've found myself in is a bit lacking. Well, actually I'm just mad at myself for not taking the apartment with wireless internet and telephone included, since I'll be using the internet quite frequently and talking to people would be nice. The toughest part about the trip has been the total solitude, here not being able to talk to many people (my French is horrible if I'm doing anyhting other than reading). Some people I know will be arriving as soon as the 12th, but I don't know how much I'll see them. Still, having a familiar face within 3,000 miles can be a comforting thing.
I've begun the long put-off job of defining my research and hashing out details on how its going to come together. Essentially I am comparing and contrasting the ways in which contemporary architecs are dealing with various issues and their relation to the Parisian context with thise used by early modernists such as Prouve, Corbusier, and Mallet-Stevens.
I've been researching contemporary projects like the housing by Herzog & DeMeuron, the furry apartment building, fondation cartier, and institute du monde arabe, but there are very few contemporary pieces in Paris that arent residential flats or giant civic works. So that will continue. However, with a handful of 7 or 8 I should have enough to pull out some examples of all sites and sizes.
Thursday, May 31, 2007
Montreal, Canada
The map, however, worked out (85 miles and $75 later) and will hopefully be the cornerstone of my actual in-trip deliverables. I'm still looking for a good competition to adopt, which is why the trip to the Arsenal is early on my list.
Tuesday, May 29, 2007
Chicago, Il
Wednesday, May 23, 2007
Chicago, Il
I've also been working on tracking down a few maps. I have some historic maps being scanned for me, such as the Turgot Plan and various other maps from the 1750's.
My topic is being clearly re-defined. I'm going to be looking at contemporary architecture, and how it relates to the historicity and density of the Parisien fabric. I'll be looking through multiple lenses, such as materiality, quality of light, acess to the street, etc. I also want to look at a few early-20th century examples (early modernism, such as Corbusier and Prouve) to get a better feel for how design sensibilities have changed in the last 100 years. If anyone has suggestions for buildings old or new to look at, I'm all ears until July 11.
Wednesday, April 25, 2007
Charlottesville, Va
1. Study the pre-condition of Paris as set up by Haussmann. What was the city like between 1860-1910? How did the Paris World Expo and the Age of Iron affect the thinking of Corbusier, Mallet-Stevens, and others working in the early 20th century?
2. Study 3 typographic relationships to the Haussmann plan by studying one modern building in each of the three typologic locations: In the fabric, Along the Boulevard, Terminating the Axis.
In the Fabric: Villa La Roche (1925), Immeuble Molitor (1934).
Despite not being on the Haussmann boulevards, the building chosen in the fabric is still very much linked to the changes that happened in Paris at the time. This typology is exposed to the social, political and economic changes that occurred in Paris. It also provides an interim step between “pre-condition of” and “built reaction to” the Haussmann context. A study of this typology can reveal the zeitgeist of architecture in the early 20th century (if the building chosen is from this era) and offer a more impartial reading of the other typologies.
Along the Boulevards: Centre Georges Pompidou (1977),
Annette Fierro makes the observation that the Haussmann Boulevards placed the upper and lower classes in close contact with each other, and for each increased the presence and surveillance of the other. In placing works of architecture along the axes, the buildings elevate the presence of the Parisian fabric behind, and make it more accessible. The Centre Georges Pompidou is a popular example of such architecture inhabiting the sides of the axes and allowing for such readings. Though the Pompidou is one example, other candidates for this typology should address issues of transparency and accessibility along these routes.
Terminating the Axis: Louvre Addition (1989) L’Opera Bastille (1989)
La Grande Arche (1990)
Three examples showcase three works of Mitterand’s Grands Projets, a series of large urban projects finished just prior to the 200th anniversary of the Revolution. Each is located on the Royal Axis, which conceptually extends to Versailles, whose gardens also conceptually extend infinitely into the distance. In contrast to this, Haussmann found many opportunities in Paris not to have his boulevards extend infinitely, but to be terminated in large civic monuments. This has the dual advantage of terminating grand vistas and more practically, of offering landmarks as wayfinding tools in the city. Candidates, such as the Opera Bastille, should be at or near these termination points, and will demonstrate how these modern buildings react to such a complex site condition.
3. Overlay the findings of these 4 conditions and compare and contrast to elicit a series of patterns or sensibilities about modern design in the Parisian context. This may begin in Paris, but for the most part will be post-travel analysis, so as to maximize time spent on the candidate sites.
Saturday, April 21, 2007
Charlottesville, Va
At that point, I'll either just take the info off this page, or perhaps try to continue regular postings to get feedback as I continue the research into my thesis project.
We'll see. My attention span is much shorter than one year, so we'll just se how things go.